About the event

Proofing is at the center of every artwork review in ManageArtworks, with Compare often used alongside it. When these tools are applied without a shared understanding, reviews slow down, the same corrections keep returning, and approvals become inconsistent.

You’ve already taken an important step by using an artwork management system like ManageArtworks. This session focuses on how to use Proofing and Compare more intentionally within real packaging workflows, so reviews are clearer, corrections are fewer, and approvals move more smoothly, while still recognizing where manual review plays an essential role.

Who should attend

This session is relevant if you

Actively review or approve artworks in ManageArtworks

Use Proofing and Compare as part of daily packaging workflows

Frequently see repeated corrections or extended review cycles

Want more clarity on when to rely on system checks and when manual review is essential

In this session, we’ll cover

How proofing is used in day-to-day packaging reviews, and why it remains the most critical step
How the Compare feature supports proofing decisions, and what it reliably highlights
How structured content (GDS) is changing the way teams design
Situations where Compare adds value within proofing reviews, and where manual checks are still required
Practical ways to reduce repeated corrections and approval cycles during proofing

Reserve your spot

How is this session different

Hear perspectives from ManageArtworks and Minds Eye Group, combining:

This session is:

A practical walkthrough of real review scenarios
Guidance based on how customers actually use the tools
An opportunity to raise questions, discuss challenges, and think through improvements to your current review process

This session is not: