Why a smart artwork approval process is no longer optional

.png)
If you’ve been in the packaging space long enough, you know how tiring and messy it gets: chasing versions, waiting for designers or regulatory teams to respond, or digging through endless email threads where feedback quietly disappears. And worse? When a product detail slips through and ends up printed wrong on the label. One misplaced logo, one rogue font, or one forgotten allergen warning is all it takes to put you in trouble—be it a recall, a tarnished brand image, or if the typo’s bad enough, a full-blown roast on social media.
In today’s hyper-competitive market where speed-to-market is key and customer trust is fragile while loyalty continues to decline, packaging isn’t just an attraction—it’s a brand’s promise and a guarantee rolled into one. So, behind every flawless label lies the need for a smart, efficient artwork approval process.
Companies still relying on traditional methods might question the need for change, but it’s important to recognize that shifting to a streamlined process isn’t just beneficial—it’s essential for staying relevant and reducing costly errors.
Let’s consider a mid-sized consumer goods company gearing up to launch a new product line. Everything is nearly ready—the team is just a few steps away from unveiling standout packaging. The artwork, however, needs to pass through multiple departments from regulatory to legal and marketing, only to get stuck in a loop of fragmented feedback. Email threads overflow with conflicting comments, versions multiply, and somewhere along the way, a critical compliance element gets missed.
The result? Delayed product launch, increased costs, and a slower time-to-market.
This scenario isn’t uncommon. An inefficient artwork approval process can lead to serious consequences— regulatory non-compliance, which could trigger recalls or legal issues; brand inconsistencies that confuse consumers and weaken brand identity; and drawn-out approval timelines that cause missed market windows and lost revenue.
After all, no one’s looking to buy Halloween-themed cupcakes for New Year’s.
Recommending the components of a packaging approval workflow is easy—ensuring they're actually in place is where the real value lies. While you might already have some of these elements covered, it's essential to see how they work together to create a more efficient, streamlined process. Here's a checklist to help you evaluate and strengthen your workflow:
Before ManageArtworks:
Saxco International faced significant bottlenecks in their artwork approval process. Without a centralized system, approvals were inconsistent, timelines were unpredictable, and miscommunication across stakeholders was common. This led to a high termination rate of 21%, driven largely by errors and delays in the approval cycle.
After Implementing ManageArtworks:
With ManageArtworks, Saxco transformed their approval process into a structured, trackable workflow. All stakeholders—from suppliers to internal teams—gained clear visibility and accountability. Automated reminders, version control, and proofing tools ensured that artworks were reviewed and approved on time, with fewer errors. As a result, their termination rate dropped dramatically to 8% over two years—a clear indicator of how streamlined approvals can directly impact quality and efficiency.
If your organization is facing delays, version confusion, or compliance issues in the artwork approval process, it’s time to rethink your approach. A streamlined workflow isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity, no matter your company’s size. At ManageArtworks, we work with businesses of all sizes, whether you're a growing brand or an established enterprise—to eliminate bottlenecks and bring structure, speed, and accuracy to their packaging workflows.
With the right system in place, you can overcome delays, reduce errors, and ensure brand consistency across markets.
What was once a bottleneck can now become a competitive advantage.